Unplanned Return to Hospital After Same Day Oral Cavity Resection: A Dual Institution Study.

OBJECTIVES: Primary objective: describe rates of 30-days unplanned readmission following outpatient resection of oral cavity cancer. Secondary objective: evaluate for patient and treatment factors associated with readmission. METHODS: Retrospective, dual-institution cohort study of 2 tertiary care referral centers involving adult patients undergoing resection of oral cavity cancer with plans for same-day discharge. Consecutive sample of 77 patients included. Primary outcome was unplanned readmission to emergency room or inpatient stay in the 30 days following surgery. Comparison testing was used between return and non-return groups. RESULTS: Among 77 patients treated with outpatient surgery for oral cavity cancer, 19 (25%) returned to the hospital within 30 days. Among the reasons for return, 16 (80%) were directly related to surgery, and 4 (20%) were related to perioperative medical complications not directly related to a surgical site. Among the 25 patients also undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy with their oral cavity resection, none returned to the hospital for neck-related complications. While most patients could be safely observed and discharged after return to the hospital, 8 patients (10%) required inpatient readmission. No significant differences between return and non-return groups were identified, although there was a trend toward shorter driving distance from hospital for the return group (47.6 miles vs. 69.5 miles, P = 0.097). CONCLUSION: Unplanned return to the hospital following outpatient oral cavity resection is prevalent and primarily driven by postoperative primary resection site concerns. Among patients selected for same day discharge, no definite population at highest risk of unplanned return was identified.

COVID-19 impact on facial trauma: Insights from Mississippi's only level 1 trauma center.

PURPOSE: Our primary aim was to understand and describe the impact of COVID-19 on the incidence and etiology of facial trauma in the state of Mississippi. METHODS: Retrospective review of facial trauma-related Emergency Department encounters in Mississippi from March 11, 2019 to March 10, 2021, divided into three time periods using the state of Mississippi's Governor's Office Executive Orders. Chi-square tests and segmented linear regressions were used for analysis. RESULTS: Patients presenting with facial trauma were typically male, 18-44 years old, and lived in urban zip codes. Insurance payors significantly differed across time periods. There were no significant differences in self-inflicted assault or accidental injury between the 3 time periods, with pre- and pandemic patients more likely to be self-pay while patients during recovery being more likely to have private insurance. During the pandemic, facial trauma from a family member, partner or spouse, or other person in the household significantly increased. CONCLUSION: Similar accidental facial trauma trends may reflect lower adherence to social distancing guidelines. The increase in facial trauma perpetrated by family members is consistent with reported increases in domestic violence during the pandemic. While overall facial trauma demographic patterns did not change significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were notable changes in the etiology and insurance payor of facial trauma cases. LAY SUMMARY: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare systems worldwide, and our study seeks to understand how the pandemic affected incidence of facial trauma.